Historic Houses in Seekonk, Massachusetts
Pittsburgh Pennsylvania ~ Kaufmanns Department Retailer ~ Clock
KAUFMANN’S Popular HISTORIC CLOCK ~
Kaufmann’s flagship "The Large Store" has a large landmark outdoor Clock on the corner of Fifth Avenue at Smithfield Street beside the building. The clock became a common downtown meeting spot, with the oft utilized phrase "Meet me below Kaufmann’s clock." The clock is a Pittsburgh icon, and usually featured in visual materials representing and marketing and advertising the city.
The original Flagship store in downtown Pittsburgh was built in 1887 on the corner of Fifth Ave. and Smithfield St. and became identified as The Huge Shop. It has undergone a variety of expansions and remodelings considering that then. Architect Charles Bickel created the H. and I Kaufman and I. Kaufman shops in 1898. In 1913, the architects Janssen & Abbott made a larger white terra cotta-sheathed addition in a Neoclassical revival style structure with Renaissance Revival style particulars. and a huge ornamental public clock at the corner.
Kaufmann’s was a department shop that originated in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It was owned in the early 20th century by Edgar J. Kaufmann, patron of ‘Fallingwater’ and the Kaufmann’s Desert Residence. In the post-war years the shop became a regional chain in the eastern United States, and was final owned by Federated Division Retailers. At the height of its existence it had some 59 shops in five states.
The former flagship Kaufmann’s in downtown Pittsburgh
Formerly portion of Could Department Retailers prior to that company’s acquisition by Federated on Aug. 30, 2005, Kaufmann’s operated as element of the Filene’s organization in Boston, Massachusetts.
On Feb. 1, 2006, the Filene’s/Kaufmann’s organization was dissolved and the management of its stores was assumed by Macy’s East and the new Macy’s Midwest. On Sept 9, 2006, the Kaufmann’s name was retired as Federated Division Shops converted the former Could Organization brands to the Macy’s masthead.
Central Downtown Historic District NRHP #85003216
By Onasill ~ Bill Badzo on 2008-01-11 02:21:34
On Tuesday, November 2nd , three inquiries will be brought to Massachusetts voters in the form of referenda. Inquiries #1 and #3 pertain to taxation of alcohol and to the reduction of state sales tax, respectively. Question two, alternatively, bargains with an concern that several individuals dont know as a lot about, but which is of important significance.
The ballot initiative would have a great effect on the varieties of apartments for rent in Boston, as properly as the costs of these apartments, due to the fact it would repeal a 41 year-old law that enables certain zoning exemptions for housing developers that dedicate a percentage of their new housing projects to inexpensive housing. For instance, beneath the current rule, in order to steer clear of neighborhood zoning ordinances, luxury apartments in Boston have to create one particular inexpensive apartment for every 3 marketplace-rate apartments that are constructed in the same project.
There is a nuanced debate underway about the effects of this law, know as Massachusetts Chapter 40B. Proponents that favor the repeal of the law, such as Affordable Housing Now, a Massachusetts activist group, argue that the law is outdated, and has had the general effect of producing Massachusetts the third most costly state in the union in terms of housing prices.
Other proponents in favor of repeal argue that it is unfair that effective developers can use the weight of the 40B exemption to override the wishes of regional zoning boards. For instance, a city planner in Bellingham, Massachusetts when commented, regarding a new 40B project: I have a lot of issues The only cause they are going with 40B is to bypass the Planning Board.” This is a case in point exactly where a local city planners opinion is stated to have been silenced by an outside improvement business.
Undoubtedly most Massachusetts residents would agree that their town councils must have a say more than regardless of whether a massive apartment complex is to be built in their town or not. This is the goal of arranging boards. But the other side of the coin is that residents from wealthy communities may possibly wish to repeal the law so that they can block new construction of reasonably priced housing within their personal communities. For example, some Boston residents might support the creating of a new Boston luxury rental complex, but not a developing that combines high-finish apartments with government subsidized housing. This thinking could have the impact of a more stratified state, in terms of the incomes and types of people that reside in numerous towns and cities.
Nevertheless a third problem concerning the 40B repeal query is regardless of whether housing that is regarded affordable by the law is really affordable. Some residents claim that it is not, and as a result favor repeal. In the finish, Massachusetts voters will make a selection on this complicated problem. The benefits of this decision will figure out whether or not power lies with regional preparing boards, or with actual-estate developers that wish to create mixed-income housing.
Written by Bruce Garland for Fenway. Bruce wants to assist you get the ideal boston luxury apartments, boston luxury rentals, and luxury apartment boston that you can by means of Fenway.